TOWN
OF
WATER
COMMISIONERS
MINUTES
Approved
DATE:
TIME:
PLACE:
PRESENT: Water Commissioners
Mr. McGettigan called the meeting
to order at
1.
Election of Chairman
Mr. Schultz noted that he would prefer to elect a chairman
now rather than wait until after the March election.
Mr. Tuttle explained that with the
difficulties he was having he could not continue to do the work required of the
chair and agreed that the Commission needs someone to be the Chairman from now
until March.
Mr. McGettigan noted that he was
willing to serve.
A MOTION was made by Mr. Schultz and SECONDED by Mr. Tuttle
to appoint a current Chairman.
Voting: motion carried unanimously.
A MOTION was made by Mr. Schultz and SECONDED by Mr. Tuttle
to appoint
Voting: motion carried unanimously.
2.
Appoint Clerk
A MOTION was made by Mr. McGettigan and SECONDED by Mr.
Schultz to hire
The Commissioners discussed the
need to include the Clerk’s rate of pay in the motion for clarification.
The motion was AMENDED to include “at the rate of $14.50 an
hour.”
Mr. Tuttle noted that he also
received a resume from Mary LaChance and he would
like the Board to consider her for the Clerk position in the future if the need
arises.
Voting: 3 ayes; motion carried unanimously.
3.
Minutes of
The Board discussed communications
that had been sent to Ms. Eckstrom. Mr. McGettigan stated that the letters Ms.
Eckstrom received stated that her services were not needed. Mr. Tuttle
disagreed and stated that the letters did not state that she was terminated
that she was not to come to anymore meetings. Mr. Tuttle also disputed the
opinion that he had invited Ms. Eckstrom to future meetings.
Ms. Eckstrom noted that that she
was at the November 30th meeting, recorded the meeting for three
hours, and was asked to perform duties throughout the meeting that a secretary
would perform. She also noted that everyone from the public acknowledged her at
the meeting as the Secretary of the Commission and she would like to see one of
two versions of the minute adopted. In response to a question from Mr.
McGettigan, Ms. Eckstrom stated that she notified the Board that she had a
conflict and could not come to the October meeting.
Mr. Schultz stated that he would
like the record to show that he was unaware that the Board had hired a
secretary as it had not been decided upon by the group.
Mr. Tuttle suggested that the Board
approve the minutes taken by Ms. Eckstrom because they include his objections
to October 28th minutes.
After further discussion, a MOTION was made by Mr. Schultz and
SECONDED Mr. Tuttle to accept the minutes of
Voting: 3 ayes; motion carried unanimously.
The Commissioners reviewed the
minutes of
The minutes of
4.
Water Bills
A MOTION was made by Mr. Schultz to raise the water bills by
$10 every six months.
Mr. Tuttle questioned whether it
would be more appropriate to raise bills by a percentage.
Mr. Schultz stated that he is
proposing that the base rate be raised $10 so that there is a charge of $45 per
unit. He stated that he is not sure that $2 per thousand is an appropriate fee
considering that the costs of chemicals, increase in
electricity costs, and considering the repairs that have been needed recently.
Mr. Tuttle noted that that Carl
acquired two chlorinators from Jaffrey for free.
Mr. Schultz noted that the Commission has a right to change the fees before the
billing cycle and if things are going
downhill in July and August they can change the rate in September and noted
that he does not want to give the end users an expensive bill unless it
necessary.
In response to a question from Mr.
Tuttle, Mr. Schultz stated that the increased fee would increase revenue by
$18,000 per year.
Mr. Tuttle stated that he could
support the increase as long as the Commission reviews the rate during the
summer.
A MOTION was made by Mr. Tuttle and SECONDED by Mr. Schultz
that the Commission advertise public notice for a March public hearing to
entertain a $10 increase and have a public meeting before the regularly
scheduled March meeting, noting the increase will be subject to review midyear.
Voting: 3 ayes; motion carried unanimously.
5.
Budget
Selectman Dick Rockwood stated that
there is confusion as to what numbers the Commission is presenting to the
Budget Committee and question why the budget that the Budget Committee reviewed
had an increase from $251,600 last year to $331,000. This
year.
Mr. Tuttle noted that the budget
includes the
Mr. Schultz left the meeting at
Mr. Tuttle noted that he was having
difficulty getting a current list of users from the town clerk’s office and
that he feels that some of the current locations should be charged for more
than one unit because they are pulling extra water.
Mr. McGettigan stated that he
thinks the system is good and does not want to change it.
6.
Bill payment
Mr. Tuttle explained that the
Commission had received a letter from Underwater Solutions looking to confirm
that the Commission wants them to inspect the tank this spring. He noted that
this company will inspect the tank with a diver and if they agree the cost will
only be $200 more than last year ($3,050), however the letter of intent needs
to be signed by February 1st.
He noted that they could use this company to inspect the coating on the
interior of the tank.
Mr. Tuttle stated that he would
move that the Commission lock in the price from Underwater Solutions and noted
that while he does not to think the offer will be good for another month he
does not think the Commissioners need to decide on the issue this evening. The Board however decided to not sign this
contract.
The Commissioners reviewed a
proposal from Ciardelli for the propane. Carl noted
that the tanks are currently full so nothing can be done currently but
suggested that the Commissioners consider the proposal when there is no gas
left in the tank. Mr. Tuttle stated that the current price that Ciardelli is offering is $2.29 per gallon and they just
paid $2.69 per to Suburban Propane. He also noted that there would be no charge
for a new tank at that price.
7.
Update on Back Flow Devices
Mr. Tuttle explained that Randy
Dunn had all the devices installed at Souhegan and he
questioned whether the Commissioners would accept an inspection that was done
by his contractor who is certified by NE Water Works rather than having NE
Backflow inspect it. Mr. McGettigan and Mr. Tuttle found no objection to Mr.
Dunn using his own inspector as long as he is certified.
Mr. Tuttle explained that with
regard to Roedele’s, he has a letter from NE Backflow
that states that only one device on Souhegan Street
would not be a good idea. He explained that they will probably need five
devices, one for the wood building, and four on
Mr. Tuttle noted that
Mr. Tuttle explained that the
School Board has discussed putting money in the budget for the devices at
Mr. Tuttle stated that he talked to
Morris about the recycling center device and they have one live line by the
office that remains live when the rest are is shut off. After discussion, the
commissioners suggested that they could use a ¾” device and meter.
Mr. Tuttle stated that the two
cemeteries do not have meters or backflow devices but he has talked to them
about having a system that could be put in in the
spring and taken out in the fall.
Mr. Tuttle also suggested that they
Commissioners consider a valve to shut off the river crossing device.
Mr. Tuttle stated that he has been
working on getting contact information for someone in charge for the Draper
Energy building. He stated that he was able to contact someone and they are
happy to have the devices installed so now it is just a matter of getting the
project coordinated.
Mr. Tuttle stated that he appeared
before the
Mr. Tuttle questioned whether the
Commissioners should but a ¾” device at the town barn.
8.
Water Payments and
Income
The Commissioners discussed the
Martel bill as Mr. Tuttle had some concerns as to how the balance was accrued.
A MOTION was made by Mr. McGettigan and SECONDED by Mr.
Tuttle to recess the meeting.
Voting 2 ayes; motion carried unanimously.
Chairman McGettigan declared the
meeting adjourned at
Respectfully
Submitted,